|
b.bitter
|
 |
« on: February 07, 2010, 03:09:19 PM » |
|
What word would Rush Limbaugh use for a major political figure who had to scribble cheat notes on her hand?
Go Saints!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never is the question asked,"Is our children Learning"
|
|
|
|
Nomad
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2010, 06:10:57 PM » |
|
What word would Rush Limbaugh use for a major political figure who had to scribble cheat notes on her hand?
Teleprompterless.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Heb 11:13 All these faithful ones died without receiving what God had promised them, but they saw it all from a distance and welcomed the promises of God. They agreed that they were no more than foreigners and nomads here on earth.
|
|
|
|
b.bitter
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2010, 08:04:45 PM » |
|
Starts with an R?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never is the question asked,"Is our children Learning"
|
|
|
|
Nomad
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2010, 05:39:40 PM » |
|
Starts with an R?I did some research on this, by listening to Rush Limbaugh today. He spoke about Sarah's speach and used three different words beginning with R. These were: REAL
REAGANESQUE And
Right On! Right On! Right On! If I can be of any more assistance, let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Heb 11:13 All these faithful ones died without receiving what God had promised them, but they saw it all from a distance and welcomed the promises of God. They agreed that they were no more than foreigners and nomads here on earth.
|
|
|
|
b.bitter
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2010, 06:15:45 PM » |
|
Why thank you. And yes I do request additional assistance. If you were interviewing a job applicant ,and you noticed that they had " HARD WORKER " and "good with people" and "Attention to detail " written in there hand, what would you think?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never is the question asked,"Is our children Learning"
|
|
|
|
b.bitter
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2010, 06:19:59 PM » |
|
Starts with a "R".
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never is the question asked,"Is our children Learning"
|
|
|
|
Nomad
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2010, 07:58:30 PM » |
|
Your original post asked what word Rush Limbaugh would use to describe "a major political figure who had to scribble cheat notes on her hand?"
I told you exactly what Rush Limbaugh said about her.
Now you want me to give my opinion on an entirely different situation; one which has nothing to do with Sarah Palin - who was not interviewing for a job. The scribbles were topical reminders of what she wanted to speak about.
While I do not have any illusions or hopes regarding Sarah Palin, the fact that she scribbled a few notes on her hand mean very little. She spoke virtually impromptu, without note cards or MR. TELEPROMPTER.
The fact that you are trying to make a big deal of nothing, however, speaks volumes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Heb 11:13 All these faithful ones died without receiving what God had promised them, but they saw it all from a distance and welcomed the promises of God. They agreed that they were no more than foreigners and nomads here on earth.
|
|
|
|
b.bitter
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2010, 05:52:14 AM » |
|
Yes and your response was refreshingly literal. Thank You. She actually read from pages her entire speech. The notes on her hand were to help her in the canned Q+A. And I only requested more of you because I thought that you offered. We need a little emoticon to indicate sarcasm.  No Biggie. The question is really rhetorical anyway. Maybe we should get an emoticon for that. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never is the question asked,"Is our children Learning"
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Dial
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: February 10, 2010, 02:45:24 PM » |
|
Alex Jones had the best comments about her. As nice and down to earth as she may be she 1). Was selected by McCain a progressive, pro gun control and etc. 2). Endorsed the governor of Texas Rick Perry an insider that goes to builderberg meetings. Who pushed a number of new taxes and the Trans American highway toll highway and that international banker scandal. Also the protection of illegals who today when they get a DWI in Texas they have to pay a $1 fine in contrast to you paying $5,000 and the lose of your car. In fact many so car confiscations happen that I think it is 70 a day in one city. Once a car is taken down there for any reason almost none are returned to the owner but are so at owners expense. Texas is well known for police scams pulling anyone over entering Mexico looking for money and planting drugs on them. This has been going on from the time I went down there in the 1980s but it is far worse today. Alex view may be correct that she is being set up to run the party in the next election for the intent to fail as the international bankers want 4 more years of Obama. When I saw Reagan years ago talk about how he was going to change Washington to be conservative and end the CIA and etc. Only to pick at the last moment Bush sr. as a running mate ( CIA, Skull and bones, Insider) well Washington is about image, perception and corporate pay offs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gordy
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2010, 08:29:49 AM » |
|
I find it almost humorous that Sarah Palin is heading to Arizona to campaign for McCain, the bumbling neocon and progressive. The progressive neocon agenda are the very things she should hate if she was truly "rogue". Now that J.D. Hayworth has officially announced his candicacy to run against McCain, Sarah must be finding herself in a position in supporting the staus quo versus real fundamental back to basics, at least as it pertains to spending and size of government. J.D. was the speaker at the local Repbulican Lincoln Day dinner recently. I haven't researched his views much yet but from what he said at the dinner he has strong neocon leanings regarding war but is very anti-progressive in other areas. He is much closer to what Sarah Palin professes to be about than McCain. I believe she sold out during the process of justifying running with and supporting McCain, evidenced again by her continuing activities in that regard. When you compromise your principles it always seems to bring trouble, irony at the very least. Sticky wickets are such a nuisance for politicians. Maybe she'll see her error but maybe not. I think she is too far down the road of selling her soul in order to be accepted by the mainstream. Instead of turning it around I bet she will try to justify her continuing McCain support like a true politican trying to cover up a glaring contradiction.
I also thought it was hilarious when McCain's daughter recently called herself a "progressive Republican". As if that was a surprise considering her hyper progressive father. So what do we have? Sarah Palin supporting arguably one of the most progressive (busy body) Republicans in the Senate. If she can't see the obvious conflict either she truly is not very smart or she has sold out for personal gain. Regardless, she has proven to me she does not merit my support. Just another deal making politican who is willing to sell their soul to get on top of the heap. Sorry Sarah. I know rouge and you aren't.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." William Pitt
|
|
|
|
Underdog
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2010, 04:14:23 PM » |
|
My conclusion, at least for the moment, is that Palin is great at "Slogan-eering". She knows the right things to say. Things that I believe she philosophically believes, and that many others would agree with.
However, I tend to think, that she lacks the substance behind the slogans. I'm not sure that she has enough information to substantiate her slogans.
I'm not sure she has the information, experience, research skills, or thought-process to substantiate any decision making that would be required to act on these slogans.
Beyond the slogans, issues arise, and a decision maker has to decide how to handle conflicting objectives. Slogan-eering doesn't a leader make.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Does your church have any ministry to the elderly?
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Dial
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2010, 05:42:19 PM » |
|
Thanks Gordy, I must admit I did not know where this person was at. I tend to think she had been corrupted by insiders. She may have felt she had little choice when it comes to the pocket book.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mill
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2010, 06:42:26 PM » |
|
Sarah is just being used by the establishment. She is not much of a rogue. She is just being used to bring the tea-party movement "under control". She is either incredibly naive or she has knowingly sold out (or perhaps made a "pragmatic compromise" thinking that if she obeys orders now she can do her own thing when she gets in).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Wagenius
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: February 21, 2010, 12:17:18 PM » |
|
I would rather have TEA with Sarah.... Than a beer with Obama !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
b.bitter
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: February 21, 2010, 03:23:20 PM » |
|
Mrs. Palin can't get "in" anywhere because she can't be a serious candidate for President. She quit her last job. She could have been a big star at the Governors conference next week and shown herself off as a member of that exclusive and elite club that is American Governors. But she gave that all up because being Governor is hard work for low pay compared to selling books and stating opinions. She went for the quick buck and I don't blame her. It was probably the smart decision. And now anyone can have TEA with Sarah..... it'll cost $100,000. No Pay, No Play. Ask C-PAC.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never is the question asked,"Is our children Learning"
|
|
|
|